How we review.
The difference between reading a vendor’s page and running the tool, said plainly.
Four levels of evidence
- Vendor published
- The fact comes from the vendor’s own pricing or feature page. We give the number and say where we read it. This is the default for prices and plan limits.
- Vendor confirmed
- The vendor has confirmed something in writing that isn’t on a public page, such as a plan limit or a programme rule.
- Our own work
- We’ve used the tool in outbound work we run. We describe what we saw and keep it apart from the vendor’s claims.
- Measured
- We took the reading ourselves, for example from a test send, rather than taking it from a claim.
Today every review on this site is at the first level: facts read on the vendor’s own pages. Each review says so at the top, with the date we checked, and its test section stays empty until a real test has run.
What we don’t do
- We don’t write a review from a vendor’s marketing copy alone and present it as independent testing.
- We don’t report a vendor’s headline number without the limit that comes with it.
- We don’t publish a score, a ranking or a badge that a vendor has paid for.
- We don’t accept free access in exchange for a positive review, and if a vendor gives us access, we say so.
How we check prices
We open the vendor’s pricing page in a browser and write down the plan name, the price, the billing period and the limits next to it. Where a price depends on the billing period, we publish both. Where a page says two different things, we say so instead of picking one.
How often we re-check
Before publishing, and again whenever a vendor changes its pricing. Each review shows the date it was last checked.